monkey
04-10-2011, 07:09 AM
Hi,
I have a simple webpage monkeysaudio.com that offers a 1MB download. The download gets about 4000 downloads a day.
I currently have the webpage on BlueHost and the download on Amazon S3.
Would moving the download to BlueHost (100-200GB/month of static file serving) be welcome?
I spoke with BlueHost over chat and they wouldn't give me a concrete answer. They said:
"It doesn't appear that it would cause a problem."
but also
"if there are a lot of them at the same time that could be a problem" and "unfortunately when an account is causing performance problems for the whole server it will be deactivated."
I would like a concrete answer. Is 100-200GB/month of static file serving welcome on my account or will it get me deactivated?
Thanks.
I have a simple webpage monkeysaudio.com that offers a 1MB download. The download gets about 4000 downloads a day.
I currently have the webpage on BlueHost and the download on Amazon S3.
Would moving the download to BlueHost (100-200GB/month of static file serving) be welcome?
I spoke with BlueHost over chat and they wouldn't give me a concrete answer. They said:
"It doesn't appear that it would cause a problem."
but also
"if there are a lot of them at the same time that could be a problem" and "unfortunately when an account is causing performance problems for the whole server it will be deactivated."
I would like a concrete answer. Is 100-200GB/month of static file serving welcome on my account or will it get me deactivated?
Thanks.