BlueHost blacklisted by att.net?
Is anyone else seeing BlueHost blacklisted by att.net? My emails there only have been bouncing back for several days now with this message:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at outbound-mail-39.bluehost.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[username omitted here]@att.net>:
Connected to 22.214.171.124 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 550-126.96.36.199 blocked by ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=worldnet,dc=att,dc=net
550 Blocked for abuse. See http://www.att.net/general-info/rblinquiry.html"
--- Enclosed are the original headers of the message.
The first ticket I opened on this disappeared from the tracking system after a few hours, for what it's worth. I just opened another.
Last edited by DavidRodeback; 03-05-2007 at 10:51 AM.
Reason: should not have included an e-mail address
not aware, but these things happen quite often i believe just due to the nature of email activity going on. I assume bluehost spam team needs to contact att to get the ip unlisted
I've seen the same block message from att.net. These problems crop up when folks have their incoming BH email forwarded to their ISP email address. The email gets forwarded, spam and all. The ISP sees the incoming spam, and it appears to be coming from the BH mail servers, so the BH servers get blacklisted.
This would stop happening if BH customers simply set up their email client programs to fetch their email directly from BH, instead of having it forwarded to another account.
Yes, I'm seeing that, too. Is there anything we (or BlueHost) can do now that the block is active?
Not in my case. When my online order entry system sends a confirmation email to the customer's email address I sometimes get a rejection notice (from att.net and other ISPs). Just today, I got a rejection from a company's email server (don't know where it is hosted) indicating that BlueHost is a spam source. I opened a ticket on it.
Originally Posted by Early Out
Those people who have their emails redirected have got Bluehost added to the spammer list. You are just seeing the result of their action. One of the problems with shared hosting is that when one person on the shared hosting does the wrong thing then everyone else on the same hosting shares the penalty.
Originally Posted by dkinzer
This is also a case where the ISPs have configured things incorrectly and are blaming the wrong site for sending the spam because they don't examine the headers properly to figure out where the email originally came from.
Exactly, and it's especially nasty because of the way BH has its mail servers set up. If you look at headers, you discover that each box doesn't have its own outbound mail server. Mail you send can go out through any one of a number of shared mail servers. So, the people who are having their email forwarded, spam included, don't even have to be on the same box you're on for you to feel the effects of it.
Originally Posted by felgall
You're also right about ISPs not examining the headers. They take the path of least resistance (and least processing power) - messages delivered by IP address X include a lot of spam messages, therefore, we will refuse connections from IP address X. That's as far as the inquiry goes.
Last edited by Early Out; 03-05-2007 at 07:34 PM.
yes I have gotten it for a few weeks now.
Originally Posted by DavidRodeback
I thought the person blocked it but now it makes sense
seem like someone in bluehost sent out spam like email, and get reported to att
erm.. i not using bluehost email this moment, but quit concern about spam issue. :(
No, that's not how this problem occurs. BH's anti-spam measures are very effective - it's pretty tough to send out mass emails from BH, especially at the levels that a spammer would need.
Originally Posted by charlesgan
Instead, the problem occurs when someone has their incoming BH email forwarded to their att.net account. The BH account is receiving a lot of spam. That all gets forwarded to att.net. So, att.net thinks that the spam is originating from BH, when it actually isn't.